Classic meanings: These are exceedingly contradictory, in the main, it is a card of money, business, barter, but one reading gives altercation, quarrel—and another innocence, ingenuity, purgation.

Concerning love, this card is clarified by: I realize that I am in love with this girl. It’s not that she’s a magazine cover beauty, it’s that when we’re talking, I feel like I’ve known her all my life.

Original description of the card by the author – Arthur Edward Waite: A young man, leaning on his staff, looks intently at seven pentacles attached to a clump of greenery on his right, one would say that these were his treasures and that his heart was there.

Classic meanings: Arrival, approach—sometimes that of a messenger, advances, proposition, demeanor, invitation, incitement.

In addition, it means for love: I like the way you kiss – a couple of test kisses, then a huge kiss.

Original description of the card by the author – Arthur Edward Waite: Graceful, but not warlike, riding quietly, wearing a winged helmet, referring to those higher graces of the imagination which sometimes characterize this card. He too is a dreamer, but the images of the side of sense haunt him in his vision.

Classic meanings: Concord, contentment, physical bien-être, also victory, success, advantage, satisfaction for the Querent or person for whom the consultation is made.

The signifficance for love is explained by specific arcanum: I believe in love at first sight, and I believe that’s what you are going to have.

Original description of the card by the author – Arthur Edward Waite: A goodly personage has feasted to his heart’s content, and abundant refreshment of wine is on the arched counter behind him, seeming to indicate that the future is also assured. The picture offers the material side only, but there are other aspects.

Classic meanings: Application, study, scholarship, reflection, another reading says news, messages and the bringer thereof, also rule, management.

Additional omen for love: Hm. Your question almost seems like foreplay.

Original description of the card by the author – Arthur Edward Waite: A youthful figure, looking intently at the pentacle which hovers over his raised hands. He moves slowly, insensible of that which is about him.

Classic meanings: Misery, distress, indigence, adversity, calamity, disgrace, deception, ruin. It is a card in particular of unforeseen catastrophe.

A special insight for love: Through all of it, he’ll be your support, your anchor. You couln’t have guessed how one man’s shoulders can possibly be so strong.

Original description of the card by the author – Arthur Edward Waite: Occult explanations attached to this card are meager and mostly disconcerting. It is idle to indicate that it depicts ruin in all its aspects, because it bears this evidence on the surface. It is said further that it contains the first allusion to a material building, but I do not conceive that the Tower is more or less material than the pillars which we have met with in three previous cases. I see nothing to warrant Papus in supposing that it is literally the fall of Adam, but there is more in favor of his alternative—that it signifies the materialization of the spiritual word. The bibliographer Christian imagines that it is the downfall of the mind, seeking to penetrate the mystery of God (Nature). I agree rather with Grand Orient that it is the ruin of the House of Life, when evil has prevailed therein, and above all that it is the rending of a House of Doctrine. I understand that the reference is, however, to a House of Falsehood. It illustrates also in the most comprehensive way the old truth that “except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it.“

There is a sense in which the catastrophe is a reflection from the previous card, but not on the side of the symbolism which I have tried to indicate therein. It is more correctly a question of analogy, one is concerned with the fall into the material and animal state, while the other signifies destruction on the intellectual side. The Tower has been spoken of as the chastisement of pride and the intellect overwhelmed in the attempt to penetrate the Mystery of God (Nature), but in neither case do these explanations account for the two persons who are the living sufferers. The one is the literal word made void and the other its false interpretation. In yet a deeper sense, it may signify also the end of a dispensation, but there is no possibility here for the consideration of this involved question.